Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
581-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

581-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971585 50.866690)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971514 50.866682,-0.971517 50.866696,-0.971527 50.866709,-0.971543 50.866719,-0.971562 50.866725,-0.971584 50.866728,-0.971606 50.866726,-0.971626 50.866719,-0.971642 50.866710,-0.971653 50.866697,-0.971656 50.866683,-0.971653 50.866669,-0.971643 50.866657,-0.971628 50.866647,-0.971608 50.866640,-0.971586 50.866638,-0.971564 50.866640,-0.971544 50.866646,-0.971528 50.866656,-0.971518 50.866668,-0.971514 50.866682)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL